-
Pages
-
Categories
-
Monthly Archives
- September 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (2)
- February 2009 (2)
- November 2008 (1)
- October 2008 (1)
- September 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (2)
- March 2008 (1)
- February 2008 (3)
- January 2008 (5)
- December 2007 (1)
- November 2007 (5)
- October 2007 (5)
- August 2007 (5)
- June 2007 (2)
- May 2007 (2)
- April 2007 (4)
- January 2007 (8)
- December 2006 (3)
- November 2006 (2)
- October 2006 (2)
- September 2006 (5)
- August 2006 (5)
- December 2005 (3)
- November 2005 (3)
- August 2005 (2)
- July 2005 (1)
- June 2005 (4)
- April 2005 (2)
- March 2005 (1)
- February 2005 (4)
- January 2005 (4)
- December 2004 (6)
- November 2004 (11)
- August 2004 (2)
- July 2004 (1)
- May 2004 (13)
- April 2004 (2)
- February 2004 (2)
- January 2004 (1)
- December 2003 (5)
- November 2003 (3)
- October 2003 (4)
- September 2003 (1)
- July 2003 (3)
- June 2003 (1)
- May 2003 (1)
- April 2003 (1)
- March 2003 (1)
- February 2003 (2)
- January 2003 (6)
- December 2002 (7)
Monthly Archives: July 2003
In Praise of Japanese Otaku...
July 23, 2003 – 8:55 PM
Just watch this I love the Japanese....
Read More
Speaking of Howard Dean
July 23, 2003 – 8:38 PM
He's got a profile up on Friendster. Update: So does Dubya...
Read More
Howard Dean has 'em running scared
July 7, 2003 – 12:39 PM
Yesterday I was watching a political roundtable on CNN. It featured Peter Beinart of the New Republic, Donna Brazille (Al Gore's campaign manager in 2000), National Review's Jonah Goldberg and some guy from the conservative rag The Weekly Standard. The question came up about Howard Dean and his fundraising prowess. Beinart and Brazille poo-poohed it, saying Dean was going to have to tilt back towards the center to avoid alienating the electorate. Goldberg and the other conservative hack started off by saying, if Howard Dean is the Democratic candidate in 2004, Bush is going to win 45 states, and that the Democrats would be smart to choose someone more moderate. What was interesting was that Goldberg then immediately conceded that Dean was actually quite the centrist, but had been absolutely wrong on the war. Then I read this on Drudge, where Dean is supposedly going to dump Terry McAuliffe after he wins New Hampshire, and quotes a senior Dean campaign advisor as the source. Maybe it's just me, but I don't see anyone in the Dean campaign going to Drudge to drop juicy quotes. Then we have this story about Karl Rove claiming to be delighted with the prospects of a Dean candidacy. Why all the attention on Howard Dean? I think the Bush Cartel is genuinely concerned about the prospects of a Candidate Dean. The man is blunt and would mop the floor with Bush in a debate. Try as they might to paint him as the "new McGovern", the man is a centrist and the biggest threat. By pooh-poohing him and saying yeah, he's exactly who we want to face in the 2004 election, Rove & Co are trying to play mind games with the Dems. It's my opinion that Howard Dean scares the bejeebus out of the Republicans. If he's such a weak candidate, why all the attention? Why the mind games?...
Read More